White House Makes Anti-Freedom Positions Clear Ahead of Election

by
posted on November 1, 2024
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
White House
(Robert Lyle Bolton via Flickr)

“Ban assault weapons now,” the White House’s official account posted Wednesday on X, accompanied by the caption, “It’s time.”

The post comes less than a week before the 2024 election and on the back of countless claims from President Joe Biden (D)—and yes, he is technically still the sitting president—that nothing he or Vice President Kamala Harris (D) want to do infringes on the Second Amendment.

“From our cold, dead hands,” replied the NRA with an American flag included.

The renewed call to ban “assault weapons” also follows the Harris’ recent claims that former President Donald Trump (R), if elected again, would “terminate the Constitution” and noted that she is the one in favor of the Second Amendment.

Harris’ campaign issues page echoes this call as well, stating, “She’ll ban assault weapons.”

She also previously said on the debate stage in September: “We’re not taking anybody’s guns away. So, stop with the continuous lying about this stuff.”

The reality is that banning rifles lawfully owned by millions and millions of Americans does violate the Second Amendment and she has also been in favor of gun confiscation.

Estimates from the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF) show that there are more than 28 million AR-type rifles in circulation. They are clearly protected under the “common-use” standard established by the U.S. Supreme Court in D.C. v. Heller (2008). With nearly 30 million of these rifles owned by law-abiding Americans, that standard is easily met.

As for the ban that Biden and Harris are so eager to impose, its previous iteration showed how ineffective these bans are. The Federal Assault Weapons Ban, passed in 1994 and that sunset in 2004, was found to have little, if any, effect on crime.

“The congressionally mandated study of the federal ‘assault weapon ban’ of 1994-2004 found that the ban had no impact on crime, in part because ‘the banned guns were never used in more than a modest fraction of gun murders,’” reported the NRA Institute for Legislative Action (ILA).

Latest

Holiday Gift Guide

The Trade Association for the Firearms Industry is Calling Out JPMorganChase

The CEO of JPMorganChase, Jamie Dimon, went on Fox News and claimed that JPMorganChase does not debank individuals, associations or corporations for ideological reasons. But the NSSF points out that Dimon has said different things before.

Gun Review | Rost Martin RM1C

I would like to introduce you to the Rost Martin RM1C—and yes, anyone familiar with the Glock 19 will immediately see its lineage. I nevertheless became intrigued by this gun, as I believe you might, thanks to some of its special features—and thanks to its price tag.

The NRA is Still Fighting for Our First Amendment Freedoms

Though the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 9-0 in favor of the NRA's argument in NRA v. Vullo, the decision sent the case back to a lower court, which ruled the offending government official had "qualified immunity." As a result, this case is ongoing.

Policing Should Not Be A Political Issue

Crime is a complicated topic, but there is an extremely simple rule that must be observed before one can begin to fight it effectively: One must genuinely wish to deal with the problem. Without such an elementary ambition, no amount of legislation, activity, taxpayer money or speechmaking will make the slightest bit of difference.

Gun-Control Group Inadvertently Admits Armed Citizens are Effective

The gun-control group Everytown inadvertently admitted that lawfully armed citizens stop a lot of crimes in America.



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.