Judge Denies Gun Companies’ Motion To Dismiss Newtown Lawsuit

posted on April 15, 2016

On Thursday, a Connecticut Superior Court judge denied a motion to dismiss a lawsuit that holds gunmakers and sellers liable in the Newtown shootings committed by an insane madman. The defendants in the lawsuit, which include Remington Arms, had argued that the lawsuit should be dismissed under the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA). That 2005 federal law shields the firearms industry from liability for crimes that it had no part in, no advance knowledge of, nor any reasonable suspicion of facilitating. 

While attorneys for the plaintiffs celebrated Judge Barbara Bellis’ decision, the ruling doesn’t prevent the defendants from filing future immunity claims. But it could open the floodgates to similar frivolous litigation. And as we wrote last month, that outcome could be devastating.

“If this argument is successful, you could see gun manufacturers stop selling these guns (AR-15-type rifles) to the public permanently,” warned UCLA Law Professor Adam Winkler.

Latest

Beretta “Rinascimento”
Beretta “Rinascimento”

The Extraordinary Berettas Of The NRA Museums

This set of five of the finest shotguns ever commissioned by the centuries-old firm has been exhibited in several locations, with a last stop at the NRA museum before returning to Italy.

The Armed Citizen® April 5, 2025

True stories of the right to keep and bear arms

Trump’s DOJ Just Surprised Anti-Gun States

Thousands of Californians remain stuck in limbo, waiting for their government to recognize and uphold their constitutional rights.

Gun Skills | Reloading 4: Load Refinement

If you are not satisfied with the cartridges you are handloading, there are plenty of avenues for improvement.

Gun Review | Lipsey’s Ruger SP101

The size, configuration and versatility of this gun makes it a fine choice for self-defense.



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.