Government Agencies Should Not Be Doing This

by
posted on December 22, 2022
Statistics.Pexels(1)
Burak The Weekender/Pexels

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has been caught red-handed deleting defensive-gun-use statistics from its website.

In a story broken by Stephen Gutowski at The Reload, a collection of emails accessed through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request showed that gun-control activists worked closely, both face to face and via email, with CDC officials to remove statistics they didn’t like from the CDC’s website. Specifically, they didn’t want people to know about criminologist Gary Kleck’s 1992 study that indicated that Americans use firearms for self-defense up to 2.5 million times a year.

Apparently, the 2.5 million figure was making it more difficult for gun-control advocates to argue that guns are seldom used for self-defense. That prompted Mark Bryant, head of the Gun Violence Archive, and two other gun-ban activists to work with the CDC to seek removal of that figure.

“That 2.5 million number needs to be killed, buried, dug up, killed again and buried again,” Bryant wrote to CDC officials after their meeting. “It is highly misleading, is used out of context and I honestly believe it has zero value—even as an outlier point in honest DGU discussions.”

For his part, Kleck, professor emeritus at Florida State University’s College of Criminology and Criminal Justice, said the CDC did not contact him before removing the figure.

“CDC is just aligning itself with the gun-control advocacy groups,” Kleck told The Reload. “It’s just saying, ‘We are their tool, and we will do their bidding.’ And that’s not what a government agency should do.”

This again proves that the federal government under the Biden administration is working with anti-gun advocates to sway the critical discussion on defensive gun uses toward the anti-Second Amendment point of view. Interestingly, this is not the first time this year that a federal agency has committed such a breach of conduct.

Earlier this year, the FBI grossly underreported the number of times armed citizens had stopped mass murderers over an eight-year period. John Lott, head of the Crime Prevention Research Center (CPRC), brought that fact to the attention of Congress when he testified before the U.S. House Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security.

“The FBI reports that armed citizens stopped only 11 of the 252 active shooter incidents that it identified for the period 2014-2021,” Lott told the members of Congress in attendance. “To compile its list, the FBI hired academics at the Advanced Law Enforcement Rapid Response Training Center at Texas State University. Police departments don’t collect data, so the researchers had to find news stories about these incidents.

“The CPRC also undertook a search for news stories,” Lott said. “We discovered a total of 360 active shooter incidents from 2014 to 2021, and found that an armed citizen stopped 124 of these.”

An open and honest discussion, with the best data available there for all to see, is what fosters healthy and productive policy debates. These attempts to control the narrative by eliminating data gun-control groups find inconvenient to their agendas should not be happening in a free country.

Latest

computer robot illustration
computer robot illustration

How Artificial Intelligence Is Repackaging Gun-Control Talking Points

AI is fed biases by its creators and these include those towards the Second Amendment.

White House Makes Anti-Freedom Positions Clear Ahead of Election

This comes as Biden and Harris have repeatedly claimed nothing they intend to do will infringe upon the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding Americans.

The Armed Citizen® November 1, 2024

True stories of the right to keep and bear arms

Kamala Harris Wants Lawfully Armed Citizens’ Guns

Instead of going after and prosecuting those who are committing crimes, Harris would rather disarm and take away freedom from law-abiding citizens.

Harris Claims She, Not Trump, Will Defend the Second Amendment

Harris’ comments on Trump are peculiar given the candidates’ respective track records, particularly on the Second Amendment.

Two Candidates, Two Futures: One Choice For Gun Owners

Looking at the records of the two candidates allows us to see what their respective administrations might look like. In this election, the choice for gun owners could not be clearer.



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.